Uniformity of the minimal exponent on the GIT boundary of projective hypersurfaces
PDF, 12 pages. “Open the PDF” opens in a new tab.
Overview
This paper studies the global minimal exponent of projective hypersurfaces in the strictly semistable locus of Geometric Invariant Theory (GIT). For a hypersurface X ⊂ ℙn of degree d ≥ 3, Park's stability criterion gives the upper bound (X) ≤ (n + 1)/d whenever X is not GIT stable.
The paper proves that this bound is uniformly sharp: a general member of every irreducible component of the strictly semistable locus attains exactly the same critical value. It also constructs zero-weight representatives with this value over a nonempty open subset of each irreducible component of the GIT boundary.
The argument explains the uniform values observed in the author's studies of cubic fivefolds and quintic threefolds through a common geometric feature: the barycenter of the degree simplex lies in the convex hull of the relevant monomial supports.
Sources: Abstract and introduction (pp. 1–2); Park's criterion, Theorem 4.1 (p. 9).
The invariant
The global minimal exponent (X) is the minimum of the local minimal exponents at the singular points of X. The local invariant is the negative of the largest root of the reduced Bernstein–Sato polynomial, with value infinity when that polynomial is 1. A smooth hypersurface therefore has global minimal exponent infinity.
Main theorem
Work over ℂ, with n ≥ 1 and d ≥ 3. Write Σss for the locus of hypersurfaces that are semistable but not stable under SL(n + 1), and let π : Σss → ∂MGIT be the quotient map to the strictly semistable GIT boundary.
Uniformity on every strictly semistable component
A general member X of every irreducible component of Σss satisfies
Thus the critical value depends only on the degree and the ambient projective dimension, and is the same across all these components.
Zero-weight representatives on the quotient
For every irreducible component B of ∂MGIT, there exist a nonempty open subset Bˆ ⊆ B and a nontrivial one-parameter subgroup λ : 𝔾m → SL(n + 1) such that each b ∈ Bˆ admits a strictly semistable representative [f] with
Here the middle equality holds for every t ∈ 𝔾m: the defining polynomial lies in the weight-zero subspace for this one-parameter subgroup. The more precise Theorem 4.2 proves the equality for general polynomials in both the maximal strictly torus-semistable monomial families and their weight-zero subspaces.
Sources: Main Theorem (p. 1); Theorem 4.2 and its proof (pp. 10–11).
Scope of the result
The generality assumption is essential
Equality is asserted for general members, rather than for every strictly semistable hypersurface. Remark 4.3 gives a concrete example: the chordal cubic threefold Y ⊂ ℙ4 has a closed orbit but satisfies
(Y) = 3/2 < 5/3.
An existence statement for representatives
The quotient-side theorem provides a zero-weight representative with the critical minimal exponent. It does not assert that these representatives are polystable or have closed orbits. The minimal exponent is evaluated on the chosen hypersurface representative.
Throughout the paper, hypersurfaces are treated as effective Cartier divisors defined by their equations; reducedness is not assumed. See Section 1 (p. 3).
Idea of the proof
The proof reduces the singularity invariant to a convex-geometric computation that is identical for every support in a finite covering.
-
Cover the strictly semistable locus by monomial families
The numerical criterion and the enumeration of maximal supports produce finitely many families associated with I(rk)≥0. The closures of their SL(n + 1)-saturations, intersected with the semistable locus, form a finite covering of the strictly semistable locus. Lemma 2.3 identifies the shared condition: both the support and its weight-zero part contain the barycenter of the degree simplex in their convex hulls.
η = d/(n + 1) · (1, …, 1) ∈ Conv(I(rk)=0). -
Reduce the quotient image to the weight-zero subspace
For a semistable polynomial in one of the nonnegative-weight families, write f = f0 + f>0. Its one-parameter limit is f0, which remains semistable and represents the same point of the GIT quotient. The resulting zero-weight families give a finite covering of the boundary after taking closures of their quotient images.
-
Compute the minimal exponent at the vertex of the affine cone
For either support S, let 𝔞S be its monomial ideal. A theorem of Mustaţă–Popa identifies the cone-vertex minimal exponent of a general linear combination of these monomials with the log canonical threshold of this ideal. Howald's formula computes that threshold from the Newton polyhedron.
Every generator has degree d, and the convex hull contains η. Hence the diagonal ray first enters the Newton polyhedron at η, with parameter τ = d/(n + 1).
(f) = lctv(𝔞S) = 1/τ = (n + 1)/d.This is the threshold of a monomial ideal, so it may exceed 1. The argument does not require an isolated singularity at the cone vertex.
-
Match the lower bound with Park's upper bound
Invariance under smooth pullback and lower semicontinuity transfer the cone-vertex calculation to all singular points of the projective hypersurface, giving (X) ≥ (n + 1)/d. Park's criterion then implies semistability. The support makes the hypersurface non-stable, so Park's upper bound gives the reverse inequality and therefore equality. The finite coverings carry this conclusion to every irreducible component.
Guide to the paper
The links below open the corresponding pages of the accompanying PDF in a new tab.
| Location | Contents |
|---|---|
| Introduction (pp. 1–2) | Main Theorem, motivation, proof strategy, and the scope of the quotient-side statement. |
| Section 1 (pp. 3–4) | Notation, monomial supports, one-parameter subgroups, and the numerical criterion. |
| Section 2 (pp. 4–7) | Maximal supports, Algorithm 2.2, the barycenter criterion, and the finite covering theorem. |
| Section 3 (pp. 7–9) | Reduction of quotient images to weight-zero subspaces and the covering of the GIT boundary. |
| Section 4 / Theorem 4.1 (p. 9) | The definition of the minimal exponent and Park's stability and semistability criteria. |
| Theorem 4.2 (pp. 10–11) | The uniformity theorem and its proof using monomial ideals and the affine cone. |
| Remark 4.3 (p. 11) | The chordal cubic threefold and the necessity of the generality assumption. |
| References (pp. 11–12) | Background on GIT, monomial ideals, minimal exponents, and the related hypersurface papers. |